About Us

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Public Counsel provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families, and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

Public Counsel addresses the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

Public Counsel files strategic impact litigation so entire communities get the justice they deserve. By setting legal precedents and challenging unjust laws, our cases spark large-scale change in our society.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied on pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us in supporting clients, taking on high-impact cases, and strengthening our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Community Education

Public Counsel promotes healthy and resilient communities through education and outreach, providing trainings, legal resources, and practical guidance that help people understand their rights, navigate complex systems, and take informed action.

Learn More

Resource Library

Popular Resources

See All

Guide

10/19/26

Trauma-Informed Deposition Preparation Guide

The Trauma-Informed Deposition Guide integrates social work values into legal practices in an attempt to reduce negative impacts on youth clients during deposition. The intention of this guide is to...

Learn More

Guide

08/18/26

Navigating COVID-19 EIDL Loan Repayment

This FAQ is designed for small business owners and nonprofit organizations nationwide that received an SBA COVID-19 EIDL and are now navigating repayment, delinquency, or default. It covers program basics,...

Learn More

Guide

08/10/26

California Nonjudicial Foreclosure Process – Primary Mortgage

This guide provides an overview of the California judicial foreclosure process for primary (first lien) mortgages, covering the full timeline from pre-foreclosure through the foreclosure sale — a minimum of approximately...

Learn More

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Public Counsel provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families, and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

Public Counsel addresses the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

Public Counsel files strategic impact litigation so entire communities get the justice they deserve. By setting legal precedents and challenging unjust laws, our cases spark large-scale change in our society.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied on pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us in supporting clients, taking on high-impact cases, and strengthening our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Community Education

Public Counsel promotes healthy and resilient communities through education and outreach, providing trainings, legal resources, and practical guidance that help people understand their rights, navigate complex systems, and take informed action.

Learn More

Popular Resources

See All

Guide

10/19/26

Trauma-Informed Deposition Preparation Guide

The Trauma-Informed Deposition Guide integrates social work values into legal practices in an attempt to reduce negative impacts on youth clients during deposition. The intention of this guide is to...

Learn More

Guide

08/18/26

Navigating COVID-19 EIDL Loan Repayment

This FAQ is designed for small business owners and nonprofit organizations nationwide that received an SBA COVID-19 EIDL and are now navigating repayment, delinquency, or default. It covers program basics,...

Learn More

Guide

08/10/26

California Nonjudicial Foreclosure Process – Primary Mortgage

This guide provides an overview of the California judicial foreclosure process for primary (first lien) mortgages, covering the full timeline from pre-foreclosure through the foreclosure sale — a minimum of approximately...

Learn More

Immigrants’ Rights

Defending the Dignity and Rights of Immigrants in Detention

Overview
Explore Sections

Case Overview

Our Clients

Our organizational Client

Since early 2025, immigrant communities in the United States have lived under siege. Families have endured unlawful mass raids in their neighborhoods and watched loved ones disappear into a detention system where abusive and illegal conditions are allowed to persist, and accountability has vanished. In Southern California, thousands of people are funneled into the Adelanto ICE Processing Center—one of the largest immigration detention centers in the country—after being apprehended in immigration raids. 

Every person—regardless of their background, status, or skin color—deserves to be treated humanely and with dignity. But inside Adelanto, people are subjected to conditions that would be considered abuse in almost any other setting. Detainees are routinely denied urgent medical care: requests for treatment are ignored, delayed, or dismissed as not serious enough to warrant attention. One man lost the top of his finger and went untreated for months. Another, who has epilepsy, is denied consistent access to medication and suffers repeated seizures without timely medical response. 

People with disabilities are neglected and abandoned. Elderly detainees with mobility impairments are forced to climb ladders to sleep on top bunks, risking serious injury because basic accommodations are denied. At least two people have died in custody—raising grave questions about whether adequate care was ever provided. 

Conditions at Adelanto are unsanitary and dangerous. Mold grows on walls. Dormitories have experienced outbreaks of contagious disease, sending people to the hospital. People are forced to live amid filth, hunger, and cold: food is insufficient and sometimes spoiled, drinking water appears dirty and foul-tasting, and thin blankets are inadequate for warmth. When detainees protest the conditions or speak out, they are met with retaliation and punishment, including isolation. This is cruel and degrading, and it is unlawful. 

Adelanto has a long and well-documented history of unsafe and abusive conditions and has been the subject of repeated investigations and public condemnation. Yet in less than a year, the federal government’s mass raids drove the detained population at Adelanto from just three people to nearly two thousand—without sufficient staffing, adequate medical infrastructure, or basic safeguards to protect health and safety. A longtime staff member warned the surge was “dangerous,” and state inspectors confirmed those fears, describing “alarming” conditions and documenting abuse and neglect of detainees with disabilities—comparing the treatment of human beings to “dogs in cages.” Operated by the private for profit prison company GEO Group, Adelanto exemplifies a system where human confinement is monetized, and the incentive is to keep people detained rather than safe.  

On January 26, 2026, four people currently detained at Adelanto filed a proposed class action lawsuit on behalf of everyone who is or will be detained there, together with the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA). The lawsuit seeks to end the unlawful and dangerous conditions at Adelanto and to secure enforceable protections, including adequate medical care, disability accommodations, safe and sanitary conditions, and meaningful oversight. 

The Constitution does not stop at the doors of a detention center, and being in custody does not strip anyone of the right to basic medical care, humane treatment, or dignity. It protects all “persons”—including immigrants and detained people—from cruel treatment, deliberate indifference to medical needs, and punitive conditions of confinement. Detention cannot mean lawlessness, and no one should be caged, commodified, or forced to endure trauma simply for seeking safety or opportunity.

UPDATE: Following a hearing, the District Court granted Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction and provisionally granted Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification on July 16, 2026. The Court’s order protects all people currently detained—and those who will be detained—at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center while the case continues.

Download our bilingual Know Your Rights guide explaining these protections and how to report violations or retaliation: Download the Know Your Rights Guide

Press conference to announce the filing of the lawsuit, held at Public Counsel on Jan. 26, 2026.
Court

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Status

Filed

Case No.

5:26-cv-00322

Filed

01/26/2026

Our Co-Counsel

Case Developments

FILING

10/22/2026

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Enforce

Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Enforce to compel Defendants to comply with the Court’s Preliminary Injunction ordering immediate improvements to the conditions at Adelanto, as well as an ex parte application for an order shortening time due to the exigency of the conditions at Adelanto. Judge Sykes granted the application to shorten time on October 26, 2026.

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO ENFORCE

PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME

WATCH THE NOVEMBER 5, 2026 HEARING

RULING

10/20/2026

District Court Denies Defendants’ Ex Parte Application for Request for Stay Pending Appeal

On October 9, 2026, Defendants moved ex parte for a stay pending appeal of the District Court’s Order Modifying Preliminary Injunction and First Amended Preliminary Injunction Order. On October 20, 2026, Judge Sykes denied Defendants’ request.

DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A STAY OF ECF 130 AND ECF 147 PENDING APPEAL

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

RULING

10/13/2026

Ninth Circuit Denies Defendants-Appellants’ Request for Emergency Stay

On October 10, 2026, Defendants-Appellants moved the Ninth Circuit for a stay pending appeal and an immediate administrative stay of the District Court’s Order Modifying Preliminary Injunction and First Amended Preliminary Injunction Order. The Ninth Circuit denied both, citing Defendants’ months-long delay.

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS’ EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL AND FOR AN IMMEDIATE ADMINISTRATIVE STAY

PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS’ EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL AND FOR AN IMMEDIATE ADMINISTRATIVE STAY

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY MOTION  FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

ORDER FROM NINTH CIRCUIT DENYING DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS’ REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE STAY

ORDER FROM NINTH CIRCUIT DENYING DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS’ REQUEST FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

RULING

10/11/2026

Defendants Appeal Order Modifying Preliminary Injunction and First Amended Preliminary Injunction Order; Ninth Circuit Grants Plaintiffs’ Motion to Consolidate the Appeals

On October 9, 2026, Defendants appealed Judge Sykes’s Order Modifying Preliminary Injunction and First Amended Preliminary Injunction Order months after their entry. Two days later, the Ninth Circuit granted both Plaintiffs’ request to consolidate those appeals with the existing appeal of the Preliminary Injunction Order and Defendants’ Request to Expedite, with Appellants’ supplemental opening brief filed October 23, 2026, Appellees’ Answering Brief due November 13, 2026, and retaining the hearing date of December 15, 2026.

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO CONSOLIDATE AND EXPEDITE

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL OPENING BRIEF

WATCH THE DECEMBER 15, 2026 HEARING AT THE JAMES R. BROWNING UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE, SAN FRANCISCO CA COURTROOM 2, 3RD FLOOR RM 330 10:00 AM (LIVESTREAM LINK TO FOLLOW)

COURTROOM 2, 3RD FLOOR RM 330 10:00 AM (LIVESTREAM LINK TO FOLLOW)FILING

09/17/2026

Defendants File Opening Brief in Preliminary Injunction Appeal

Defendants filed their Opening Brief in their appeal to the Ninth Circuit of the District Court’s Preliminary Injunction Order.

DEFENDANT-APPELLANTS’ OPENING BRIEF

RUling

09/11/2026

District Court Enters First Amended Preliminary Injunction

FIRST AMENDED preliminary injunction

RUling

08/20/2026

Ninth Circuit Denies Defendants’ Emergency Motion for Stay

A Ninth Circuit panel denied Defendants’ emergency motion to stay the district court’s preliminary injunction pending appeal. The panel lifted the administrative stay entered on August 6, 2026.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

RUling

08/06/2026

Ninth Circuit Enters an Administrative Stay of the District Court’s PI

The Ninth Circuit granted Defendants’ emergency motion to stay the District Court’s preliminary injunction order while Defendants’ appeal proceeds.

ORDER

RUling

08/04/2026

District Court Denies Defendants’ Request for Stay Pending Appeal

The District Court denied Defendants’ ex parte application to stay enforcement of its preliminary injunction order while Defendants’ appeal proceeds.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ Ex Parte Application for a Stay Pending Appeal

FIling

07/31/2026

Defendants Appeal Preliminary Injunction and Seek Stays Pending Appeal

Defendants filed a notice of appeal challenging the District Court’s July 16, 2026 order granting in part Plaintiffs’ renewed motion for a preliminary injunction. Defendants also sought to stay enforcement of the preliminary injunction while the appeal proceeds, filing an ex parte application in the District Court and an emergency stay motion in the Ninth Circuit. 

DEFENDANTS’ Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit

DEFENDANTS’ Ex Parte Application for a Stay Pending Appeal

DEFENDANTS FILE EMERGENCY STAY MOTION IN THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Defendants’ Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal

Ruling

07/16/2026

Court Grants Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Provisional Class Certification

Order Granting Preliminary Injunction and Provisional Class Certification

FIling

06/05/2026

Defendants File Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint and Opposition To Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION To Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification

FIling

06/01/2026

Plaintiffs File Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction

RENEWED MOTION FOR Preliminary Injunction

FIling

05/22/2026

Plaintiffs File First Amended Complaint and Renewed Motion for Class Certification

Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint detailing continued abuses at Adelanto. Plaintiffs also filed a renewed motion for class certification.

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

RENEWED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

RUling

05/06/2026

Court Denies Motion For Preliminary Injunction Without Prejudice

The Court denied Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction without prejudice, granting Plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint. The Court also denied Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss as moot.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUCTION, GRANTING REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Filing

04/20/2026

Defendants File Motion to Dismiss

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS

Filing

04/09/2026

Plaintiffs File Motion for Class Certification

Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification, asking the court to certify a class of all individuals detained at Adelanto—now and in the future—and a subclass of persons at Adelanto with disabilities. A hearing on the motion was held on July 10, 2026.

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

Defendants’ opposition to motion for class certification

Plaintiffs’ reply in support of motion for class certification

Filing

04/06/2026

Plaintiffs File Reply Brief in Support of Motion For Preliminary Injunction

PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Filing

03/06/2026

Plaintiffs File Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction asking the District Court to enjoin Defendants’ ongoing violations of the Rehabilitation Act, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the constitutional rights of people detained at Adelanto. A hearing on the motion was held on April 28, 2026.

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Declarations

Filing

01/26/2026

Plaintiffs File Complaint

COMPLAINT

Media