About Us

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Public Counsel provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families, and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

Public Counsel addresses the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

Public Counsel files strategic impact litigation so entire communities get the justice they deserve. By setting legal precedents and challenging unjust laws, our cases spark large-scale change in our society.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Resource Library

Popular Resources

See All

Toolkit

04/03/26

Newcomer Student Education Rights

This toolkit is designed to inform advocates (attorneys and non-attorneys) about the education-related rights of newcomer and undocumented immigrant children, how to assert those rights, and what to do if...

Learn More

Guide

02/17/26

What is the Meeting of Creditors?

Once you file your bankruptcy, a Bankruptcy Trustee will be assigned to your case and a Meeting of Creditors will be scheduled. This guide will provide general information to help...

Learn More

FAQsGuide

02/10/26

Know Your Rights as a Child Care Business

This Know Your Rights guide explains California child care providers’ legal authority to control access to their facilities, including who may enter, when recording is prohibited, and how to respond...

Learn More

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Public Counsel provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families, and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

Public Counsel addresses the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

Public Counsel files strategic impact litigation so entire communities get the justice they deserve. By setting legal precedents and challenging unjust laws, our cases spark large-scale change in our society.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Popular Resources

See All

Toolkit

04/03/26

Newcomer Student Education Rights

This toolkit is designed to inform advocates (attorneys and non-attorneys) about the education-related rights of newcomer and undocumented immigrant children, how to assert those rights, and what to do if...

Learn More

Guide

02/17/26

What is the Meeting of Creditors?

Once you file your bankruptcy, a Bankruptcy Trustee will be assigned to your case and a Meeting of Creditors will be scheduled. This guide will provide general information to help...

Learn More

FAQsGuide

02/10/26

Know Your Rights as a Child Care Business

This Know Your Rights guide explains California child care providers’ legal authority to control access to their facilities, including who may enter, when recording is prohibited, and how to respond...

Learn More

Children’s rightsFoster Care

Transforming New Mexico’s Child Welfare System into a Trauma-Informed System of Care

Overview
Explore Sections

Case Overview

OUR Clients

OUR ORGANIZATIONAL ClientS

Every child entering the New Mexico child welfare system has experienced the trauma of separation from a caregiver. These children are highly likely to have experienced complex trauma, given their exposure to multiple, persistent sources of adversity, violence, and loss. Yet New Mexico fails to allocate its resources to develop a trauma-informed system of care.

In September 2018, Public Counsel, Disability Rights New Mexico, Stanford Law School Mills Legal Clinic, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg Urias & Ward, P.A., Martinez, Hart, Thompson & Sanchez, P.C., the Law Firm of Alexander D. Crecca, PC, and the Law Office of Ryan J. Villa filed a federal lawsuit against New Mexico’s Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD) and the Health Care Authority (HCA, formerly the Human Services Department) to hold them accountable to children in foster care. The complaint alleged systemic and structural failures resulting in harm to children in foster care and their families, including:

  • Lack of a system to ensure stable placements for children in safe and supportive home environments, resulting in children cycling through inappropriate and overly restrictive placements that lack the support and capacity to meet the individual needs of children.
  • Lack of a functioning system to meet the medical, mental health, and behavioral health needs of children in state custody, resulting in denial of access to necessary services including medical, mental health, and behavioral health screenings and services to which children in foster care are entitled.
  • Failure to implement trauma-sensitive practices to address the needs of children in foster care who are impacted by complex trauma, including child abuse, abandonment or neglect, and separation from their birth families and caregivers.
  • Lack of capacity within the child welfare system to provide necessary support and training to children in foster care, resource families, and relatives due to understaffing, insufficient behavioral health services and expertise in-house, and failure to properly train and support staff.

Following months of negotiations, the Parties executed a Final Settlement Agreement (FSA) on March 17, 2020. In reaching this agreement, CYFD and HCA acknowledged their commitment to the development of a trauma-informed system of care that meets the needs of New Mexico’s diverse children and youth and their families.

Since 2023, the Parties have engaged in mediation and arbitration to advance the State’s compliance with the FSA, particularly in the areas of workforce caseloads, recruitment of resource families, timely well-child visits, and accurate and accessible data.

A team of lawyers from Public Counsel, Disability Rights New Mexico, Native American Disability Law Center, and Pegasus Legal Services for Children continue to monitor the implementation of the FSA from the Plaintiffs’ perspective.

Additional information about the FSA and implementation process can be found at www.kevinssettlement.com.

Court

U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico

Status

In Arbitration

Case No.

1:18-cv-00896

Filed

09/22/2018

our Co-Counsel

Case Developments

RULING

03/02/2026

Parties Agree to and Arbitrator Issues Stipulated Third Remedial Order

In lieu of a hearing on the State’s compliance with Remedial Order Nos. 1 and 2, the State and the Plaintiffs came together and successfully negotiated the terms of the next remedial phase of this case, Remedial Order No. 3, which the Arbitrator approved and ordered. Plaintiffs negotiated Remedial Order No. 3 with the understanding that it would benefit children for the Parties to agree to the next steps the State must take in 2026 to come into compliance with the Kevin S. FSA.

STIPULATED REMEDIAL ORDER NO.3

ORDER

08/18/2025

Arbitrator Issues Second Remedial Order

Following a hearing and submissions by the parties and Co-Neutrals regarding the State’s compliance with Remedial Order No. 1, the Arbitrator issued Remedial Order No. 2, directing the State to take additional steps to comply with the FSA, the Corrective Action Plan (CAP), and Remedial Order No. 1.

ORDER

ORDER

01/21/2025

Arbitrator Issues Decision and Remedial Order

After eight days of arbitration hearings in November 2024, the Arbitrator concluded that the State failed to meet the FSA’s performance standard in the following four areas: CYFD Workforce Caseloads; Resource Family Recruitment; Well-Child Checks; and Data Submissions. The Arbitrator found that the “children in the custody of CYFD are subject to irreparable harm arising from the State’s failure to comply with the Kevin S. Agreement. That harm arises directly from (1) excessive caseloads for CYFD caseworkers and the persistent failure of the State to hire and retain an adequate number of case workers; (2) a failure by the State to develop and maintain an adequate supply of foster homes leading to the State sending children without justification to be housed in congregate settings, including CYFD offices; and (3) children being deprived of their right to timely medical checks that, if performed, would identify medical and behavioral conditions for which the State has a legal obligation to provide treatment.”  In a Remedial Order, the Arbitrator directed the State to take specific actions around the four issue areas to advance compliance with the FSA.

DECISION

REMEDIAL ORDER

FILING

05/20/2024

Plaintiffs File Arbitration Notice

The Co-Neutrals investigated the State’s performance implementing the 2023 CAP and found that the State failed to keep its promises. Consequently, Plaintiffs initiated arbitration to seek specific performance of the CAP.

FILING

order

06/30/2023

Corrective Action Plan Executed

After engaging in mediation from March to June 2023, the Parties executed a CAP that set forth commitments by CYFD and HCA to come into compliance with the FSA and to ensure that children in state custody are able to benefit from the commitments outlined in the FSA. The CAP includes the State’s commitments regarding CYFD’s workforce caseload, recruitment and retention of family-based placements, ending the use of out-of-state placements, review of critical incidents, access to real-time data, and the development of an integrated system of care for children in state custody.

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN

Filing

06/15/2022

Memorandum of Understanding Reached

The Parties set forth a plan for CYFD and HCA to improve compliance with Appendices B and C of the FSA, which concern use of the least restrictive and appropriate placements, as well as the Indian Child Welfare Act. The Memorandum of Understanding also aimed to increase and improve communication between the State and Plaintiffs regarding progress on implementation targets and target outcomes in these areas.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

SETTLEMENT

03/17/2020

Settlement Reached

Following months of negotiations, the Parties executed an FSA with the goal of implementing a system of care that utilizes collaborative decision-making to coordinate delivery of care to children in state custody in a trauma-responsive manner. The FSA includes the appointment of Kevin Ryan and Judith Meltzer as Co-Neutrals with the authority to validate performance and to audit progress toward achievement of the implementation targets and target outcomes.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Filing

09/22/2018

Plaintiffs File Complaint

Fourteen young people in foster care and two nonprofit organizations filed a class action lawsuit against the CYFD and HCA challenging their persistent failure to fulfill its state and federal legal obligations to children in state custody. The Complaint asserted the State’s actions violate the Substantive Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act; the Americans with Disabilities Act; Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment Services Provisions of the Medicaid Act; the Reasonable Promptness Provision of the Medicaid Act; and the Indian Child Welfare Act.

Complaint

Media