About Us

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Our team provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families,  and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

We address the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

Our team provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families,  and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon the generous donation of pro bono services from lawyers, legal professionals, and law students as the keystone for our model of delivering free legal services to low-income communities.

Learn More

Resource Library

Popular Resources

See All

Guide

10/29/25

Robo de Identidad: Qué hacer si alguien está usando su número de Seguro Social

Descubrir que alguien ha usado su número de Seguro Social (SSN) puede ser angustiante y abrumador. No estás solo. Este folleto explica los pasos clave que puede seguir, dependiendo de...

Learn More

Guide

10/29/25

Identity Theft: What To Do If Someone Is Using Your Social Security Number

Finding out someone has used your Social Security number (SSN) can be upsetting and overwhelming. You are not alone. This handout explains the key steps you can take, depending on...

Learn More

Guide

09/26/25

Guía sobre cómo presentar y notificar una respuesta a una demanda no verificada

¿Cómo presento y notifico una respuesta a una demanda?

Learn More

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Our team provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families,  and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

We address the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

Our team provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families,  and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon the generous donation of pro bono services from lawyers, legal professionals, and law students as the keystone for our model of delivering free legal services to low-income communities.

Learn More

Popular Resources

See All

Guide

10/29/25

Robo de Identidad: Qué hacer si alguien está usando su número de Seguro Social

Descubrir que alguien ha usado su número de Seguro Social (SSN) puede ser angustiante y abrumador. No estás solo. Este folleto explica los pasos clave que puede seguir, dependiendo de...

Learn More

Guide

10/29/25

Identity Theft: What To Do If Someone Is Using Your Social Security Number

Finding out someone has used your Social Security number (SSN) can be upsetting and overwhelming. You are not alone. This handout explains the key steps you can take, depending on...

Learn More

Guide

09/26/25

Guía sobre cómo presentar y notificar una respuesta a una demanda no verificada

¿Cómo presento y notifico una respuesta a una demanda?

Learn More
Mae M. v. Komrosky

Education Equity

Ending Censorship of Public School Curriculum by Temecula School Board

Overview
Explore Sections

Case Overview

our Clients

In December 2022, the Board of Trustees of the Temecula Valley Unified School District passed a resolution that bans the teaching of a sweeping and ill-defined range of content referred to as “Critical Race Theory and other similar frameworks,” censoring what students learn about American history and their own identities. While the Board claims that its ban targets critical race theory, Board members have used the resolution’s vague provisions to eliminate from Temecula’s classrooms any concepts that conflict with their ideological viewpoints, including the history of the LGBTQ rights movement and the existence of racism in today’s society. The resolution’s lack of clarity has chilled many teachers into silence and led to large-scale protests by students who say that their constitutional rights to learn and to be free from discrimination are threatened by the ban. 

To fight back against this censorship, students, parents, and individual teachers filed a lawsuit on August 2, 2023, against the Board over the enactment of its resolution banning the teaching of concepts with which Board members disagree. The suit is a first-of-its-kind case in California and seeks to invalidate the unconstitutional resolution in Temecula, creating a legal precedent that affirms students’ right to comprehensive, fact-based education in California’s K–12 public schools. 

The plaintiffs came together to defend the right to learn for all students; however, their lawsuit highlights that the ban is particularly harmful to students of color and LGBTQ students, whose identities, histories, and cultures it stigmatizes and sidelines. And the ban jeopardizes the jobs and well-being of teachers across the District, who have to square the resolution’s restrictions with the content they are mandated to teach under the State’s academic standards. 

The Temecula students, parents, and educators are represented by Public Counsel and Ballard Spahr LLP, with the support of the California Teachers Association. Ballard Spahr is working on the case as part of the firm’s Racial Justice and Equality Initiative, a pro bono plan of action dedicated to combating racial injustice and inequity through litigation.

Court

Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside

Status

Active

Case No.

CVSW2306224

Filed

08/02/2023

our OrganizationAL Partner

public counsel Legal Team

our Co-Counsel

Case Developments

RULING

05/19/2025

Appellate Court Blocks Curriculum Censorship

The Court of Appeal reversed the lower court’s denial of students and teachers’ request for a preliminary injunction preventing the Temecula Valley Unified School District Board of Trustees from enforcing its ban on teaching “Critical Race Theory and other similar frameworks.” 

OPINION

Filing

06/14/2024

Plaintiffs Appeal Order Denying Preliminary Injunction

Plaintiffs filed an appeal challenging the Superior Court’s order denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.

Appellants’ Opening Brief

Filing

02/16/2024

Court Denies Defendants’ Demurrer and Anti-SLAPP Motions

Judge Keen indicated that he will allow the case of Mae M. v. Komrosky to go forward, confirming that Plaintiffs have made viable challenges to the School Board’s policies under California law.

Tentative ruling (pages 4-20)

Notice of Ruling on Motion for Preliminary Injunction

ACLU SoCal and First Amendment Coalition AMICUS Brief in support of plaintiffs

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Demurrer

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Anti-SLAPP Motion

Filing

12/22/2023

World’s Largest Trade Book Publisher, Writers’ Associations, First Amendment Advocacy Groups File Amicus Brief in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Penguin Random House, The Authors Guild, First Amendment Coalition, The Freedom to Read Foundation, PEN America, and Freedom to Learn Advocates have filed an amicus brief in support of Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, stating: “Young readers cannot expand their intellectual horizons if the only speech allowed in books is that which aligns with the views of government authorities. In a democracy, the government can contest ideas, but it cannot seek to censor them. State censorship—no matter the political cause behind it—quells free thinking. Temecula Valley Unified School District’s suppression of books, which is motivated by government officials’ disagreement with the views expressed in the books, violates the First Amendment.”

Penguin random house, et al. Amicus Brief in support of plaintiffs

Filing

12/14/2023

ACLU Foundations File Amicus Brief in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction

The ACLU Foundation of Southern California and the ACLU Foundation of Northern California filed an amicus brief in support of Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, stating “California law requires public schools to protect transgender and gender non-conforming students from discrimination and harassment and respect their privacy. The policy challenged here does just the opposite, impairing students’ ability to express themselves authentically at school and seeking to stigmatize transgender identities. The law, research, and student testimonies all make clear there is no place in California public schools for policies that put the safety and welfare of students at risk. Plaintiffs’ interest in ensuring transgender and gender non-conforming students are provided a safe and supportive education environment free of hostility and discrimination is an urgent one. Failure to grant a preliminary injunction in this case will result in significant and irreparable harm to TVUSD’s transgender and gender non-conforming students.”

ACLU amicus brief in Support of Plaintiffs

Filing

12/11/2023

CA Attorney General Files Amicus Brief in Support of Temecula Students

California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed an amicus brief supporting a challenge by teachers, students, and parents to two Temecula School Board policies that violate students’ constitutional and statutory rights. TVUSD Board Resolution 21 purportedly prohibits the teaching of “Critical Race Theory,” and it includes sweeping language that would censor, for example, Native American history and Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” Board Policy 5020.01 compromises students’ safety, well-being, and privacy, and violates their equal protection rights, by mandating the forced outing of transgender and gender-nonconforming students without their consent and even when doing so would put them at risk of harm. Read the California Attorney General’s press release here.

CA Attorney General Amicus Brief in support of plaintiffs

Filing

10/13/2023

Plaintiffs File Amended Complaint

Since the filing of our lawsuit, the Board has intensified its attacks on LGBTQ students. A week into the school year, the Board passed a coercive outing policy that targets students who identify as transgender or gender nonconforming. The policy requires TVUSD teachers and staff to out transgender and gender nonconforming students to their parents or guardians, regardless of whether students consent, and it mandates the official documentation of these forced disclosures.

First Amended Complaint

Filing

08/02/2023

Plaintiffs File Complaint

Students, parents, and individual teachers filed suit against the Board of Trustees of the Temecula Valley Unified School District over the enactment of its resolution banning the teaching of concepts with which Board members disagree. The suit is a first-of-its-kind case in California and seeks to invalidate the unconstitutional resolution in Temecula, creating a legal precedent that affirms students’ right to comprehensive, fact-based education in California’s K–12 public schools.

Complaint

Media