About Us

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Our team provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families,  and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

We address the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

We pursue groundbreaking legal strategies that promote economic and social justice for low-income communities and communities of color across the nation.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Resource Library

Popular Resources

See All

FAQsGuide

02/10/26

Know Your Rights as a Child Care Business

This Know Your Rights guide explains California child care providers’ legal authority to control access to their facilities, including who may enter, when recording is prohibited, and how to respond...

Learn More

Report

01/28/26

Who Has The Power: Chronicling Los Angeles County’s Systemic Failures to Educate Incarcerated Youth

Los Angeles County officials often dismiss concerns raised by and on behalf of young people, claiming that the education-related issues for detained youth are not systemic. This report seeks to...

Learn More

GuideToolkit

01/24/26

Ensuring Family Connection: A Guide to Representing Parents in Probate Guardianships

Probate guardianships are often treated as private custody disputes, yet in practice they can resemble quasi-dependency cases—with serious and lasting consequences for parents, including suspension of parental rights and loss...

Learn More

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Our team provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families,  and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

We address the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

We pursue groundbreaking legal strategies that promote economic and social justice for low-income communities and communities of color across the nation.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Popular Resources

See All

FAQsGuide

02/10/26

Know Your Rights as a Child Care Business

This Know Your Rights guide explains California child care providers’ legal authority to control access to their facilities, including who may enter, when recording is prohibited, and how to respond...

Learn More

Report

01/28/26

Who Has The Power: Chronicling Los Angeles County’s Systemic Failures to Educate Incarcerated Youth

Los Angeles County officials often dismiss concerns raised by and on behalf of young people, claiming that the education-related issues for detained youth are not systemic. This report seeks to...

Learn More

GuideToolkit

01/24/26

Ensuring Family Connection: A Guide to Representing Parents in Probate Guardianships

Probate guardianships are often treated as private custody disputes, yet in practice they can resemble quasi-dependency cases—with serious and lasting consequences for parents, including suspension of parental rights and loss...

Learn More

acce-v-hcd

Housing Justice

Holding California Accountable for Its Failures in Implementing the COVID-19 Rent Relief Program

Overview
Explore Sections

Case Overview

our Clients

The COVID-19 rent relief program was created by the federal government to keep low-income tenants housed if they faced difficulty paying rent because of the COVID-19 pandemic. California identified over $6 billion in state and federal funds, and the California Department of Housing & Community Development (HCD) was charged with creating an application process, screening tenants for eligibility, and distributing the program funds.

However, the application process for California’s COVID-19 rent relief program (Housing Is Key) was burdensome for many of the most vulnerable people who needed such assistance. It required extensive paperwork and documentation, access to email and the ability to check it regularly, and the ability to navigate the system in English, even if it was not the tenant’s preferred language. If they managed to apply, tenants still waited months for a response and received a variety of vague responses, including approval for partial payments or a full denial of payment without adequate explanation.

The process was profoundly unfair, didn’t meet constitutional standards, and failed to achieve its most basic aim in many instances: keeping Californians housed. That’s why community-based tenant organizations ACCE and SAJE, along with research and action institute PolicyLink, filed a lawsuit against HCD for administering COVID-19 rent relief in a way that is opaque and disproportionately harms tenants on the basis of race, color, and national origin. The suit also challenges HCD’s refusal to provide public records that would shed light on its administration of the program. 

Public Counsel, Western Center on Law & Poverty, LAFLA, and Covington & Burling LLP joined forces to represent the Plaintiffs and, in May 2023, reached a historic agreement with the State of California to settle the COVID-19 rent relief cases. The settlement will bring resolution and hope to over 100,000 households who have been waiting for a year or more for the chance to receive support from the State of California. The settlement will provide new opportunities for those denied rental assistance to appeal, will add clarity to application denials, and will expand a network of community partners to assist tenants in responding to denials and appeals. People who still have pending applications as of the date of the settlement should expect to receive a new series of communications from the State and, if their applications are denied, will have 30 days to file an appeal to receive rental assistance. 

Because of this lawsuit, the State of California will improve its administration of a crucial pandemic relief program to comply with due process. As a result, low-income Californians will have a better shot at receiving the rental assistance they need to avoid eviction and stay housed. 

Court

Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda

Status

Settled

Case No.

22CV012263

Filed

06/06/2022

PUBLIC COUNSEL Legal Team

our Co-Counsel

Case Developments

Settlement

05/30/2023

Parties Reach Settlement

Plaintiffs and Defendants have reached a landmark settlement on behalf of Californians struggling with pandemic rent debt. The agreement holds HCD accountable for failures in implementing the Covid-19 rent relief program. The settlement will provide new opportunities for those denied rental assistance to appeal, will add clarity to application denials, and will expand a network of community partners to assist tenants in responding to denials and appeals. People who have pending applications as of the date of the settlement should expect to receive a new series of communications from the State and will have 30 days to file an appeal to receive rental assistance if their application is denied.

Settlement Agreement

ruling

01/19/2023

Court Orders State to Create Denial Notices that Satisfy Due Process

In modifying the preliminary injunction to comply with the Court of Appeal order, Judge Roesch said the State’s denial notices must “specify the facts supporting the denial” to satisfy due process, meaning the notice must provide enough information for applicants to understand why the State does not believe their application meets program requirements. The Court acknowledged that being told why tenants are being denied is important to allow applicants a meaningful opportunity to appeal and correct their paperwork.

Order

Petitioners’ Brief Re: Narrowing Preliminary Injunction

Respondent HCD’s Brief Re: Narrowing Preliminary Injunction

Ruling

12/20/2022

Court of Appeal Orders Superior Court to Narrow Preliminary Injunction

In November 2022, HCD filed a petition for an extraordinary writ with the Court of Appeal asking the Court to overturn the preliminary injunction. The Court of Appeal issued an order in December 2022 ordering the Superior Court to modify the scope of the preliminary injunction. However, the Court’s order said the preliminary injunction could only be modified in a way to still ensure due process so that “it prohibits the Department from denying applications for rental assistance only if the applicant has not been informed of the specific reason(s) for the denial or provided with the documents that the Department relied upon in denying the applications.”

Order

Respondent HCD’s Petition for Extraordinary Writ

Petitioners’ Opposition

Respondent HCD’s Reply to Opposition

Ruling

07/08/2022

Court Grants Preliminary Injunction

The Court sided with tenant advocates and ordered HCD not to deny any pending rental assistance applications until the Court can determine if HCD’s process meets constitutional due process standards. Judge Roesch said the State’s denial notices are too vague, do not tell applicants which of their documents led to denial, and make it difficult for denied applicants to appeal.

Order

Petitioners’ Brief

Respondents’ Opposition

Petitioners’ Reply

Filing

06/06/2022

Plaintiffs File Complaint

Three community groups sued the State of California over its COVID-19 rent relief program. The lawsuit said the program operates in an unclear and discriminatory way and does not provide adequate explanation to renters who are denied help, violating due process and fair housing laws.

Petition for Writ of Mandate