About Us

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Public Counsel provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families, and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

Public Counsel addresses the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

Public Counsel files strategic impact litigation so entire communities get the justice they deserve. By setting legal precedents and challenging unjust laws, our cases spark large-scale change in our society.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Resource Library

Popular Resources

See All

Toolkit

04/03/26

Newcomer Student Education Rights

This toolkit is designed to inform advocates (attorneys and non-attorneys) about the education-related rights of newcomer and undocumented immigrant children, how to assert those rights, and what to do if...

Learn More

Guide

02/17/26

What is the Meeting of Creditors?

Once you file your bankruptcy, a Bankruptcy Trustee will be assigned to your case and a Meeting of Creditors will be scheduled. This guide will provide general information to help...

Learn More

FAQsGuide

02/10/26

Know Your Rights as a Child Care Business

This Know Your Rights guide explains California child care providers’ legal authority to control access to their facilities, including who may enter, when recording is prohibited, and how to respond...

Learn More

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Public Counsel provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families, and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

Public Counsel addresses the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

Public Counsel files strategic impact litigation so entire communities get the justice they deserve. By setting legal precedents and challenging unjust laws, our cases spark large-scale change in our society.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Popular Resources

See All

Toolkit

04/03/26

Newcomer Student Education Rights

This toolkit is designed to inform advocates (attorneys and non-attorneys) about the education-related rights of newcomer and undocumented immigrant children, how to assert those rights, and what to do if...

Learn More

Guide

02/17/26

What is the Meeting of Creditors?

Once you file your bankruptcy, a Bankruptcy Trustee will be assigned to your case and a Meeting of Creditors will be scheduled. This guide will provide general information to help...

Learn More

FAQsGuide

02/10/26

Know Your Rights as a Child Care Business

This Know Your Rights guide explains California child care providers’ legal authority to control access to their facilities, including who may enter, when recording is prohibited, and how to respond...

Learn More

Disrupting the Jail-to-Houselessness Cycle for People Living with Mental Disabilities

Overview
Explore Sections

Case Overview

OUR Clients

Public Counsel, in partnership with its Board member firm Munger Tolles & Olson LLP, intervened in a lawsuit between the federal government and Los Angeles County that nearly resulted in policies that would discriminatorily exclude people with certain mental disabilities from jail discharge planning services, including linkages to housing assistance.

Public Counsel represented eight Plaintiff-Intervenors who were all Los Angeles residents with severe mental illnesses released from County jails without referrals to housing programs or mental health providers or an adequate supply of their prescribed psychiatric medication. Plaintiff-Intervenors brought claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Rehabilitation Act, and the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The case resulted in a modified settlement agreement which requires the County, via the agreement’s Provision 34, to provide specific discharge planning services to people with severe mental disabilities.

Because the County has not yet met the compliance measures for Provision 34, Public Counsel and Munger Tolles & Olson are actively engaging with the County and other stakeholders to implement systemic reforms that meet the needs of mentally disabled individuals released from County jails.

Court

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Status

Settled

Case No.

2:15-cv-05903

Filed

09/28/2015

our Co-Counsel

Case Developments

FILING

01/06/2026

Settlement Monitor Files Twentieth Semi-Annual Report

The Settlement Monitor assigned to evaluate the County’s adherence to the settlement terms reported that the County did not achieve compliance with metrics related to initial and comprehensive release planning.  

REPORT

FILING

05/15/2025

Settlement Monitor Files Nineteenth Semi-Annual Report

REPORT

FILING

12/06/2018

Parties Jointly Stipulate to Amend Provision 34 of the Settlement Agreement

Pursuant to the amendment to Provision 34, the County is required to conduct clinically appropriate release planning for all people discharged from the jail who have been identified by a qualified mental health professional as having a mental illness and needing mental health treatment, or as having a DSM-5 major neuro-cognitive disorder that caused them to be housed in the Correctional Treatment Center at any time during their incarceration. Release planning services include, among other components, connection and transportation to available housing or to community-based providers who can assist in meeting housing needs, assistance obtaining identification and public benefits, and a clinically appropriate supply of psychotropic medications.

The settlement also provides for unannounced monitoring visits every six months, along with semi-annual self-reporting from the County and reporting by the designated monitor. The County has not yet achieved substantial compliance with the agreement. Public Counsel engages directly with the County and community-based organizations to identify roadblocks and potential improvements to implementation.

JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND SETTLEMENT

RULING

05/17/2016

Court Denies County’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Against Plaintiff-Intervenors

The County filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that Plaintiff-Intervenors lacked standing to bring their claims and that the claims themselves were legally insufficient. The court denied the County’s motion entirely.

ORDER

FILING

01/14/2016

Plaintiff-Intervenors File Amended Complaint Challenging Provision 34

AMENDED COMPLAINT

ORDER

12/15/2015

Court Grants Plaintiff-Intervenors’ Motion to Intervene

ORDER

FILING

09/28/2015

Individuals Move to Intervene in Lawsuit to Protect Access to Vital Jail Discharge Care Services for People with Severe Mental Disabilities

The federal government and Los Angeles County entered into a settlement agreement providing for, among other things, County jail discharge planning services that excluded people with severe mental illnesses in violation of the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, forcing a group of individuals to sue on their own behalf to challenge Provision 34 of the settlement agreement.  

MOTION TO INTERVENE