About Us

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Our team provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families,  and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

We address the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

We pursue groundbreaking legal strategies that promote economic and social justice for low-income communities and communities of color across the nation.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Resource Library

Popular Resources

See All

FAQsGuide

02/10/26

Know Your Rights as a Child Care Business

This Know Your Rights guide explains California child care providers’ legal authority to control access to their facilities, including who may enter, when recording is prohibited, and how to respond...

Learn More

Report

01/28/26

Who Has The Power: Chronicling Los Angeles County’s Systemic Failures to Educate Incarcerated Youth

Los Angeles County officials often dismiss concerns raised by and on behalf of young people, claiming that the education-related issues for detained youth are not systemic. This report seeks to...

Learn More

GuideToolkit

01/24/26

Ensuring Family Connection: A Guide to Representing Parents in Probate Guardianships

Probate guardianships are often treated as private custody disputes, yet in practice they can resemble quasi-dependency cases—with serious and lasting consequences for parents, including suspension of parental rights and loss...

Learn More

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Our team provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families,  and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

We address the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

We pursue groundbreaking legal strategies that promote economic and social justice for low-income communities and communities of color across the nation.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Popular Resources

See All

FAQsGuide

02/10/26

Know Your Rights as a Child Care Business

This Know Your Rights guide explains California child care providers’ legal authority to control access to their facilities, including who may enter, when recording is prohibited, and how to respond...

Learn More

Report

01/28/26

Who Has The Power: Chronicling Los Angeles County’s Systemic Failures to Educate Incarcerated Youth

Los Angeles County officials often dismiss concerns raised by and on behalf of young people, claiming that the education-related issues for detained youth are not systemic. This report seeks to...

Learn More

GuideToolkit

01/24/26

Ensuring Family Connection: A Guide to Representing Parents in Probate Guardianships

Probate guardianships are often treated as private custody disputes, yet in practice they can resemble quasi-dependency cases—with serious and lasting consequences for parents, including suspension of parental rights and loss...

Learn More

Immigrants’ Rights

Challenging the Trump Administration’s Unlawful Termination of Protections for Immigrant Youth and Children

Overview
Explore Sections

Case Overview

Our Clients

A.C.R. et al. v. Noem et al. is a proposed nationwide class action filed by nine immigrant youth and two legal service providers challenging the federal government’s decision to end the Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) Deferred Action Policy. The SIJS Deferred Action Policy provided protection from deportation and the ability to apply for work permits to young people who have already been approved for SIJS by USCIS and who are on a legal path to permanent residency but face years-long delays due to visa backlogs.

The lawsuit—brought by Public Counsel and its Board member firm Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, along with co-counsel the National Immigration Project, Kids in Need of Defense (KIND), and Lowenstein Sandler LLP—seeks to reinstate this policy, which has protected approximately 200,000 immigrant youth who have survived parental maltreatment and whom a state court has determined should not be returned to their countries of origin. The complaint argues that the government violated the Administrative Procedure Act by ending the policy without proper notice or justification, leaving thousands of immigrant youth in legal limbo and at risk of deportation.

Court

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Status

Filed

Case No.

1:25-cv-03962

Filed

07/17/2025

Our organizational Clients

Case Developments

Ruling

11/19/2025

District Court Grants Stay of the Rescission of the SIJS Deferred Action Policy

Judge Komitee issued an order staying the government’s rescission of the 2022 SIJS Deferred Action Policy. The court found that the Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the policy reversal was unlawful for several reasons, including because the government did not consider reliance interests or alternatives to rescinding the policy. The court also ruled that, absent the stay, the Plaintiffs were likely to face irreparable harm because of the heightened risk of removal they would face without the protection of deferred action. The opinion did not grant everything the Plaintiffs requested, as the court deferred a ruling on class certification and chose not to grant relief in the form of a preliminary injunction. However, the court’s decision does provide the main relief sought: an order that blocks the rescission of the SIJS Deferred Action Policy. The decision means that the 2022 SIJS Deferred Action Policy is back in effect and “the government must therefore conduct deferred-action and employment authorization adjudications pursuant to the 2022 Policy Alert.” The court also enjoined the government from removing the Individual Plaintiffs during the pendency of the litigation.

Memorandum & Order

Filing

09/17/2025

Plaintiffs File Supplemental Memorandum

Following a lengthy hearing on September 4, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a supplemental memorandum addressing three key questions raised by Judge Komitee.

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Filing

08/22/2025

Plaintiffs File Reply Memoranda in Support of Pending Motions

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

our Co-Counsel