About Us

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Our team provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families,  and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

We address the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

We pursue groundbreaking legal strategies that promote economic and social justice for low-income communities and communities of color across the nation.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Resource Library

Popular Resources

See All

FAQsGuide

02/10/26

Know Your Rights as a Child Care Business

This Know Your Rights guide explains California child care providers’ legal authority to control access to their facilities, including who may enter, when recording is prohibited, and how to respond...

Learn More

Report

01/28/26

Who Has The Power: Chronicling Los Angeles County’s Systemic Failures to Educate Incarcerated Youth

Los Angeles County officials often dismiss concerns raised by and on behalf of young people, claiming that the education-related issues for detained youth are not systemic. This report seeks to...

Learn More

GuideToolkit

01/24/26

Ensuring Family Connection: A Guide to Representing Parents in Probate Guardianships

Probate guardianships are often treated as private custody disputes, yet in practice they can resemble quasi-dependency cases—with serious and lasting consequences for parents, including suspension of parental rights and loss...

Learn More

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Our team provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families,  and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

We address the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

We pursue groundbreaking legal strategies that promote economic and social justice for low-income communities and communities of color across the nation.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Popular Resources

See All

FAQsGuide

02/10/26

Know Your Rights as a Child Care Business

This Know Your Rights guide explains California child care providers’ legal authority to control access to their facilities, including who may enter, when recording is prohibited, and how to respond...

Learn More

Report

01/28/26

Who Has The Power: Chronicling Los Angeles County’s Systemic Failures to Educate Incarcerated Youth

Los Angeles County officials often dismiss concerns raised by and on behalf of young people, claiming that the education-related issues for detained youth are not systemic. This report seeks to...

Learn More

GuideToolkit

01/24/26

Ensuring Family Connection: A Guide to Representing Parents in Probate Guardianships

Probate guardianships are often treated as private custody disputes, yet in practice they can resemble quasi-dependency cases—with serious and lasting consequences for parents, including suspension of parental rights and loss...

Learn More

Disability RightsEducation Equity

Ensuring that Children with Disabilities Attend Safe and Supportive Schools

Overview
Explore Sections

Case Overview

our Clients

our Co-Counsel

In 2019, four courageous students stepped forward as plaintiffs to file a class action lawsuit against the California Department of Education (CDE), directors of the Contra Costa County Office of Education, and staff at Floyd I. Marchus School to challenge the unlawful and dangerous use of restraints and seclusion in non-emergency situations.   

The Floyd I. Marchus School is a public school operated by Contra Costa County that serves students with serious learning, behavioral and emotional challenges who require individualized education plans (IEPs) in order to receive a free appropriate public education.  One of the reasons that students attend specialized schools like this school is because they need highly individualized services and supports in order to learn. 

Yet, the Floyd I. Marchus school used a “Level System” behavior system that the students and their families asserted bypassed the student’s individualized education plans and behavior intervention plans and resulted in the use of restraint and seclusion. The suit asserted that these dangerous practices were the direct consequence of the state of California and the CDE’s failure to meet their constitutional responsibility for public education by their lack of oversight, intervention, and enforcement of these dangerous interventions.

Physicians, educators, and government officials have long condemned the use of restraints and seclusion on children, identifying them as ineffective and warning against their traumatizing and dangerous effects. A 2009 report from the United States Government Accountability Office documented hundreds of cases of the use of abusive restraints and found that at least twenty of these cases resulted in the victim’s death. Further, these restraints disproportionately affect students with disabilities. According to a 2014 report from the U.S. Department of Education, students with disabilities represented just 12 percent of the national student population, but accounted for 58 percent of those placed in seclusion and 75 percent of those subjected to physical restraint.  The 2017-2018 Civil Rights Data Collection Report continued to document the disproportionate impact of these dangerous practices on students with disabilities.  

In September 2022, plaintiffs reached a landmark settlement with the State of California and the Department of Education. Under the agreement, the state committed to maintain a higher degree of oversight over the school, train staff on the interventions and supports that can help students, audit the school’s records, and conduct two years of follow-up review. 

In June 2023, plaintiffs reached a settlement agreement with the Contra Costa County Office of Education to ensure that students with disabilities who attend the Floyd I. Marchus School are provided with the individualized supports and services that they need to learn, and to make sure teachers have the training they need to address behaviors without resorting to restraint and seclusion. The agreement adds to the terms agreed upon in the 2022 settlement and resolves the 2019 lawsuit.

Students across the country continue to be subject to restraint and seclusion.  According to the U.S. Department of Education, over 100,000 students are restrained or secluded each year. Several state legislatures, including New York and Connecticut, have recently introduced bills that would prohibit the use of some or all restraint and seclusion techniques and strengthen reporting requirements for greater oversight and transparency.

Court

Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda

Status

Settled

Case No.

MSC19-00972

Filed

05/13/2019

Case Developments

uPDATE

07/24/2025

Settlement Ends Restraints and Seclusion at Marchus School

As soon as the lawsuit was filed, the school greatly reduced its use of seclusion and restraints. However, it took six years of persistent oversight and accountability from Public Counsel, the California Department of Education, the directors of Contra Costa County Office of Education, and the staff at the Marchus School to finally fully embrace reforms at the school. Today, the school has successfully reported that it has drastically reduced use of these interventions over the last year and reached its first quarter without any interventions, something that couldn’t have been done without the families impacted by the punishments and the lawyers implementing the settlement.

MARCHUS QUARTERLY REPORT SUMMER 23

MARCHUS QUARTERLY REPORT FALL 23-24

MARCHUS QUARTERLY REPORT WINTER 23-24

MARCHUS QUARTERLY REPORT 23-24 Q4

MARCHUS QUARTERLY REPORT 23-24 EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR (ESY)

MARCHUS QUARTERLY REPORT 24-25 Q3

MARCHUS QUARTERLY REPORT 24-25 Q4

MARCHUS QUARTERLY REPORT 24-25 EXTENDED SCHOOL YEAR (ESY)

Settlement

06/08/2023

Settlement Reached with the Contra Costa County Office of Education (CCCOE)

The settlement requires CCCOE to cease certain practices and support initiatives promoting a more positive learning environment necessary to achieve the academic and social success of all students. These initiatives include a three-tiered Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) program and a Social Emotional Learning (SEL) curriculum. Both are designed to provide schoolwide and individual guidance to meet the unique needs of each student through tailored, individualized education programs. Additionally, WestEd – a leading educational research, development, and service agency – will provide CCCOE with oversight and guidance throughout the PBIS program and implementation of the SEL curriculum. Over the next two years, WestEd will track and report on progress and further document and address the use of restraint and seclusion. Marchus will also establish a reporting system through which parents may submit requests for an investigation if they have ongoing concerns regarding the use of these practices at the school. The settlement builds on the September 2022 agreement with the California Department of Education.

Settlement Reached with the Contra Costa County Office of Education (CCCOE)

Settlement

10/02/2020

Settlement Reached with the California Department of Education (CDE)

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the CDE will maintain a higher degree of oversight over Marchus, including: conducting two years of follow-up review of Marchus to ensure best practices are being followed and the safety of students is not compromised through the use of abusive, restrictive, and cruel restraints previously used on students; auditing Marchus’ written documentation of its policies and reports regarding prior incidents during the follow-up review period; and providing technical assistance and training for Marchus staff so that they may learn positive behavioral interventions and supports.

Settlement with California CDE

Order

01/25/2021

Judge Overrules Demurrers

Superior Court Judge Edward G. Weil overruled two demurrers – one by the Contra Costa County Office of Education, and one by the State of California, State Board of Education, California Department of Education, and Tony Thurmond, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Public Instruction – allowing the case to proceed.

Order After Hearing

Filing

10/01/2020

Amended Complaint Filed

Amended Complaint

Filing

05/15/2019

Complaint Filed

Four elementary school children with disabilities and their parents and guardians filed a class action lawsuit Monday against the California Department of Education (CDE), directors of the Contra Costa County Office of Education, and staff at Floyd I. Marchus School to challenge the illegal and abusive use of restraints and seclusion in non-emergency situations.

Complaint