About Us

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Public Counsel provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families, and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

Public Counsel addresses the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

Public Counsel files strategic impact litigation so entire communities get the justice they deserve. By setting legal precedents and challenging unjust laws, our cases spark large-scale change in our society.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Resource Library

Popular Resources

See All

Guide

02/17/26

What is the Meeting of Creditors?

Once you file your bankruptcy, a Bankruptcy Trustee will be assigned to your case and a Meeting of Creditors will be scheduled. This guide will provide general information to help...

Learn More

FAQsGuide

02/10/26

Know Your Rights as a Child Care Business

This Know Your Rights guide explains California child care providers’ legal authority to control access to their facilities, including who may enter, when recording is prohibited, and how to respond...

Learn More

Report

01/28/26

Who Has The Power: Chronicling Los Angeles County’s Systemic Failures to Educate Incarcerated Youth

Los Angeles County officials often dismiss concerns raised by and on behalf of young people, claiming that the education-related issues for detained youth are not systemic. This report seeks to...

Learn More

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Public Counsel provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families, and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

Public Counsel addresses the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

Public Counsel files strategic impact litigation so entire communities get the justice they deserve. By setting legal precedents and challenging unjust laws, our cases spark large-scale change in our society.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Popular Resources

See All

Guide

02/17/26

What is the Meeting of Creditors?

Once you file your bankruptcy, a Bankruptcy Trustee will be assigned to your case and a Meeting of Creditors will be scheduled. This guide will provide general information to help...

Learn More

FAQsGuide

02/10/26

Know Your Rights as a Child Care Business

This Know Your Rights guide explains California child care providers’ legal authority to control access to their facilities, including who may enter, when recording is prohibited, and how to respond...

Learn More

Report

01/28/26

Who Has The Power: Chronicling Los Angeles County’s Systemic Failures to Educate Incarcerated Youth

Los Angeles County officials often dismiss concerns raised by and on behalf of young people, claiming that the education-related issues for detained youth are not systemic. This report seeks to...

Learn More

J.L. v. Cissna

Immigrants’ Rights

Defending the Right to Special Immigrant Juvenile Status in California

Overview
Explore Sections

Case Overview

Our Clients

J.L. v. Cissna, et al, is a class action challenging an unlawful Trump Administration policy that sought to deny humanitarian relief to hundreds of immigrant children in California. The policy aimed to bar a class of petitioners in California, aged 18–20, from being granted Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) despite California state courts having determined these young people were eligible for this humanitarian relief based on past parental abuse, abandonment or neglect.

Plaintiffs allege that in early 2018, the federal government began to unlawfully deny class members’ petitions for relief by refusing to recognize the authority of some California juvenile courts, a change that was implemented without any notice or any public announcement. The suit was filed in August 2018 by Public Counsel; Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP; and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area (LCCR).

In October 2019, plaintiffs and defendants signed a settlement agreement that secured the rights of 2,800 immigrant youth in California and forced the Government to retract its harmful nationwide policy. The Court approved the settlement in December 2019.

Court

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Status

Settled

Case No.

18-cv-04914-NC

Filed

08/14/2018

our Co-Counsel

Case Developments

ORDER

12/18/2019

District Court Issues Final Approval of Settlement

ORDER

Settlement

10/25/2019

Settlement Signed

Plaintiffs and Defendants signed a settlement agreement that secured the rights of 2,800 immigrant youth in California and forced the Defendants to retract its harmful nationwide policy.

settlement

Order

03/15/2019

District Court Denies Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

Magistrate Judge Cousins denied the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the lawsuit, stating “Defendants’ interpretation of the SIJ statute reads in an additional requirement. Because that interpretation is contrary to federal and California law, Plaintiffs have stated a claim.”

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Order

02/01/2019

District Court Grants Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification

Magistrate Judge Cousins granted Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The Court certified the following class: Children who have received or will receive guardianship orders pursuant to California Probate Code § 1510.1(a) and who have received or will receive denials of their SIJ status petitions on the grounds that the state court that issued the SIJ Findings lacked jurisdiction because the court did not have the authority to reunify the children with their parents.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

Order

10/24/2018

District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction

Magistrate Judge Cousins issued a preliminary injunction blocking the administration’s efforts to implement their new policy. Magistrate Judge Cousins found that the Defendants’ justifications in support of their policy change were “lacking” and some of their reasoning was “flawed,” that the Plaintiffs raised “serious questions going to the merits” of the Defendants’ case, and that the immigrant children subject to the preliminary injunction face irreparable harm without the injunction.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Filing

08/14/2018

Plaintiff Files Complaint

complaint