About Us

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Public Counsel provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families, and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

Public Counsel addresses the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

Public Counsel files strategic impact litigation so entire communities get the justice they deserve. By setting legal precedents and challenging unjust laws, our cases spark large-scale change in our society.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Resource Library

Popular Resources

See All

Guide

04/27/26

Know Your Rights: Immigration Enforcement in Public Spaces

We all have constitutional rights and state law protections in California, regardless of immigration status. This guide outlines those rights and protections and steps you can take to prepare in...

Learn More

Toolkit

04/03/26

Newcomer Student Education Rights

This toolkit is designed to inform advocates (attorneys and non-attorneys) about the education-related rights of newcomer and undocumented immigrant children, how to assert those rights, and what to do if...

Learn More

Guide

02/17/26

What is the Meeting of Creditors?

Once you file your bankruptcy, a Bankruptcy Trustee will be assigned to your case and a Meeting of Creditors will be scheduled. This guide will provide general information to help...

Learn More

How We Work

See All

Direct Services

Public Counsel provides free direct legal services and support or matches clients with pro bono advocates, ensuring they have a partner standing with them, their families, and our communities as they pursue justice.

Learn More

Policy Advocacy

Public Counsel addresses the root causes of inequities in our society by advocating for inclusive policy solutions in collaboration with grassroots coalitions and the communities most impacted by systemic oppression.

Learn More

Impact Litigation

Public Counsel files strategic impact litigation so entire communities get the justice they deserve. By setting legal precedents and challenging unjust laws, our cases spark large-scale change in our society.

Learn More

Pro Bono Partnerships

Since its inception, Public Counsel has relied upon pro bono attorneys, law students, paralegals, and other legal professionals to partner with us to support clients, take on high-impact cases, and strengthen our advocacy efforts.

Learn More

Social Work Integration

Public Counsel values an interdisciplinary approach to law and social work that strengthens trauma-informed legal advocacy and advances effective outcomes across its work. 

Learn More

Popular Resources

See All

Guide

04/27/26

Know Your Rights: Immigration Enforcement in Public Spaces

We all have constitutional rights and state law protections in California, regardless of immigration status. This guide outlines those rights and protections and steps you can take to prepare in...

Learn More

Toolkit

04/03/26

Newcomer Student Education Rights

This toolkit is designed to inform advocates (attorneys and non-attorneys) about the education-related rights of newcomer and undocumented immigrant children, how to assert those rights, and what to do if...

Learn More

Guide

02/17/26

What is the Meeting of Creditors?

Once you file your bankruptcy, a Bankruptcy Trustee will be assigned to your case and a Meeting of Creditors will be scheduled. This guide will provide general information to help...

Learn More

Cayla J. v. California

Education Equity

Challenging the State of California’s Failure to Ensure Equitable Access to Education During the Pandemic

Overview
Explore Sections

Case Overview

our Clients

our Organizational CLIENTS

All students in California have a fundamental right to education under the California Constitution. But throughout our State’s history, this access has been denied to students of color and students from low-income backgrounds – a situation that worsened markedly during the COVID-19 pandemic. California’s extended period of remote schooling, which began in March 2020, exposed deeply embedded inequalities in the State’s education system.

During this period and in its aftermath, the State of California neglected its responsibility to safeguard access to education for all students. The State’s failure to ensure access to digital connectivity and devices and to provide necessary academic and social-emotional supports forced families to navigate a lengthy period of remote instruction with little support. This situation widened the opportunity gap for lower-income and Black and Latinx students – a gap that will persist until the State provides leadership and planning to remediate the harms experienced by these students during remote schooling.

In November 2020, students and community-based organizations joined together to sue the State of California for failing to fulfill its constitutional duty to ensure equitable access to education. The suit sought to redress major deficiencies in California’s remote schooling program, including unequal access to necessary technology and academic and social-emotional supports.

Presently, the lawsuit seeks intervention from the State – including oversight, assistance, and enforcement – to provide critical relief to the families and students it left behind during the pandemic. Plaintiffs aim to ensure that all California schoolchildren receive the necessary resources and support to make up for the learning time they were unlawfully denied.

UPDATE: February 1, 2024 – In one of the largest education-related settlements in U.S. history, the State of California has agreed to dedicate at least $2 billion in funding to help students who fell behind during the COVID-19 pandemic. The funding will go towards evidence-based programs proven to increase student outcomes. For more info, see the press release here, and the settlement here.

Court

Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda

Status

Settled

Case No.

RG20084386

Filed

11/30/2020

our Co-Counsel

Case Developments

Settlement

02/01/2024

Students Reach Settlement with State of California

State of California agreed to dedicate at least $2 billion in funding for evidence-based programs to help students who fell behind during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Settlement

Filing

10/25/2023

Plaintiffs File Expert Report and Addendum of Andrew Ho, Ph.D.

Andrew Ho is a psychometrician and the Charles William Eliot Professor of Education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. He provided his professional opinion regarding the meaning of test score results in California through the COVID-19 pandemic. His addendum analyzed 2022-2023 test scores and reinforced his previous conclusions.

Andrew Ho, PhD, Expert Report

Andrew Ho, PhD, Report Addendum

Order

08/07/2023

Court Rules on Motion for Summary Adjudication

The Court ruled largely in Plaintiffs’ favor, denying the State’s Motion for Summary Adjudication on all but one of Plaintiffs’ claims.

In its ruling, the Court highlighted several key facts:

  • The State “also knew that socioeconomically disadvantaged and students of color had higher percentages of lack of access to connectivity and digital devices than other students.”
  • “800,000 to 1 million students lacked connectivity or devices to connect” during the pandemic.
  • The State was “aware of this lack of access and estimated that it would cost $400-500 million to remedy this, but only raised about $18 million for this purpose.

State’s motion

Plaintiffs’ opposition

Declaration of Elizabeth Moje, PhD in Support Of Plaintiffs’ Opposition

State’s reply

Ruling on Motion for Summary Adjudication

Order

06/07/2022

Court Rules on Demurrer

“The Court, having taken the matter under submission on 05/18/2022, now rules as follows: The Demurrer of the State to Amended and Supplemental Complaint is OVERRULED except for the demurrer to fifth cause of action (Ed Code 43500), which is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The motion of the State to strike portions of the Amended and Supplemental Complaint is DENIED.”

State’s motion

Plaintiffs’ Opposition

State’s Reply

Ruling Denying Demurrer

Filing

02/09/2022

Plaintiffs File First Amended Complaint

First Amended Complaint

Filing

05/03/2021

Plaintiffs File Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Family Declarations

Organizational Declarations

Filing

11/30/2020

Plaintiffs File Complaint

Complaint

Media