California rent relief settlement

자주하는질문: COVID-19 임대료감면합의

2023년 5월 30일, 세입자 옹호자들은 ERAP 또는 ‘Housing Is Key’ 라고도 알려진 캘리포니아주의 COVID-19 임대료 감면 프로그램 관리 절차의 적법성을 문제 삼아, 캘리포니아주를 상대로 대형 소송을 제기했습니다. 해당 프로그램에서는 수천 명의 적격한 세입자가 지원을 거부당했습니다. 그 결과, 캘리포니아주 주택 및 지역 사회 개발부(HCD)는 해당 프로그램의 거부 및 항소 절차에 대한 몇 가지 중요한 개혁 합의안에 동의했습니다. 

이 자주 하는 질문에서는 이러한 소송 합의에 대한 개요를 비롯하여 해당 합의가 세입자에게 어떤 의미가 있는지 알 수 있습니다. 이 소송의 자세한 내용과 합의서 전문은 웹사이트(www.carentrelief.org)에서 확인하십시오. 이 소송은 지역 사회 권한 부여를 위한 캘리포니아주 주민 연합 행동(ACCE), 정의 경제를 위한 전략적 행동(SAJE), PolicyLink를 대표하여 법률과 빈곤 지원 웨스턴 센터(Western Center on Law & Poverty), 공익 변호사(Public Counsel), 로스앤젤레스 법률 보조 재단(LAFLA)에서 제기했습니다.

신청 상태에 대해 문의 사항이 있는 세입자는 캘리포니아주 ‘Housing Is Key’ 센터에 (833) 430-2122로 문의해야 합니다. 신청 상태를 확인하려는 세입자는 ‘Housing Is Key’ 신청 포털(https://hornellp-ca.neighborlysoftware.com/CaliforniaCovid19RentRelief/Participant)을 방문하십시오. 

신청 절차를 지원하는 지역 사회 기관에 연락하려는 세입자는 지역파트너네트워크에 (833) 687-0967로 문의해야 합니다. 

1. 해당합의에따라누가영향을받습니까?

2. 임대료감면신청에대한심사를기다려온세입자는앞으로어떻게됩니까?  

3. 새로운거부통지는어떤형식입니까?

4. 새로운거부통지는어떻게세입자에게발송됩니까?

5. 해당합의에따라항소절차가변경됩니까? 

6. 세입자가신청한지원의일부만승인받은경우에는어떻게됩니까?

7. 해당합의는이전에 ‘환수’ 통지를받은세입자에게어떤영향을줍니까? 

8. 세입자가신청을여러번했는데그중하나가 ‘중복’으로표시되면어떻게됩니까?

9. 해당합의는이전에임대료지원을거부당한세입자에게도움이됩니까?

10. 해당합의는영어를모국어로사용하지않는세입자에게도추가적인지원을제공합니까?

11. 신청상태에대해잘모르는세입자는어디에서자세한정보를얻을수있습니까?

12. 세입자가신청에대한지원을받으려면어디로가야합니까? 

13. 세입자가여전히신청에대한심사를기다리고있지만, 지금당장강제퇴거당할위기에처한경우, 어디에서도움을받을수있습니까?

14. 해당합의는어떻게시행됩니까? 

Back to Top

Tenants’ Rights Advocates Reach Landmark Settlement on Behalf of Californians Struggling With Pandemic Rent Debt

The agreement requires the California Department of Housing & Community Development to give pending and denied applicants a fair chance to receive Covid-19 rental assistance

LOS ANGELES, May 31, 2023 —A landmark settlement has been reached in a case brought by tenants’ rights advocates alleging that the California Department of Housing & Community Development (HCD) unconstitutionally operated the state’s Covid-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP or Housing is Key), which has led to qualified applicants missing out on the assistance they were promised after the pandemic destroyed many Californians’ livelihoods. More than 100,000 households are still waiting for a decision on their applications—and many of them are being served with eviction notices and being harassed by their landlords for rent they still owe. The settlement agreement will offer a renewed chance for applicants who remain in limbo to receive Covid-19 rental assistance, which remains essential to supporting and stabilizing families as the housing and homelessness crisis worsens in California.

California’s Covid-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program was created to provide direct assistance to low-income families struggling to pay rent during the pandemic. The Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE Action), Strategic Actions for a Just Economy (SAJE), and PolicyLink—represented by Western Center on Law & Poverty, Public Counsel, the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles, and Covington & Burling LLP—sued HCD in June 2022 for several systemic failures in the program, including a confusing application process that led eligible tenants to be wrongfully denied assistance.

“The rental assistance program was intended to provide housing stability for low-income tenant families who were impacted by Covid-19, but delays and dysfunction left far too many eligible families facing eviction because they could not access this critical assistance,” said Madeline Howard, Senior Attorney at Western Center on Law & Poverty. “We are hopeful that this settlement will create an opportunity for these tenants to finally receive the help they need.”

“This settlement will mitigate some of the worst long-tail impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on our local communities, and Covington is very proud to partner with our co-counsel and clients in this important work,” said Neema Sahni, Partner at Covington & Burling LLP.

California identified more than $6 billion in rental assistance from the state and federal government for the Housing is Key program, which came at a critical time and should have made a profound difference for the hundreds of thousands of families impacted by the economic fallout of the pandemic. More than half a million households applied to the program. Thus far, HCD has denied nearly 30 percent of applicants, according to an analysis of program data conducted by the National Equity Atlas (a research partnership between PolicyLink and the USC Dornsife Equity Research Institute). The vast majority of those denied (93 percent) have incomes below 80 percent of the area median income—the income threshold to be eligible for the program. Tenants did not receive any meaningful explanation of why they were being denied the help they needed to avoid eviction, and many had difficulty accessing the appeal process.

“We filed this case because we started to see a sharp rise in denials for tenants we knew were eligible, including clients of legal aid organizations across the state, who were relying on rental assistance to stay housed and off the streets,” said Faizah Malik, Senior Supervising Attorney at Public Counsel. “With the settlement of the case, many thousands of families will have another chance to receive the aid that they were promised.”

As part of the settlement, HCD has agreed to take several steps to improve its process for the remaining ERAP applications, including:

  • Providing tenants who are going to be denied all or part of the assistance they requested with a detailed explanation of the reason for denial, so they can address issues with the application and have a fair opportunity to appeal;
  • Ensuring that tenants subject to “recapture” of rental assistance funds have a fair opportunity to challenge the state’s decision;
  • Providing better access to the appeal process; 
  • Expanding funding to the Local Partner Network, which will assist tenants with navigating their pending applications and appeals;
  • Conducting an audit of prior denials to correct wrongful denials of assistance;
  • Improving language access and reasonable accommodation procedures; and
  • Providing greater transparency about who is receiving rental assistance and who is not, with data about the race, ethnicity, and zip code of people denied assistance.

Tenants who have been waiting for a decision on their applications will receive an update in the coming months and should regularly check their email, application portal, and postal mail for notifications. Tenants who have been evicted or moved since they applied for rental assistance should contact the Housing is Key program to update their contact information and ensure they receive any important notices. Those who receive a denial will have 30 days to file an appeal.

“SAJE has assisted hundreds of tenants on their rent relief applications, and many of the most vulnerable tenants are still in the waiting pool, confused and scared,” said Cynthia Strathmann, Executive Director of SAJE. “We hope that tenants now will finally get the information they need to get their applications approved so they can pay off their pandemic rent debt, a major source of continued stress and harassment.”

“This case brought us in contact with so many families who were evicted or facing eviction because of the Covid-19 pandemic,” said Jonathan Jager, LAFLA attorney. “We encourage any renters who are still waiting for an ERAP decision to not give up hope. Keep your contact information up to date with Housing is Key and reach out to the Local Partner Network if you have questions about any communications you receive from the program.”

Rent debt across California remains at crisis levels: an estimated 688,000 households across the state remain behind on rent, according to the National Equity Atlas. Altogether, they owe nearly $2.6 billion in total rent debt, with the average rent debt per household hovering around $3,700. The vast majority of these renters are low-income people of color who have suffered job and income losses due to the pandemic. This persistent and mounting debt further illustrates the importance of this settlement to keeping families in their homes and curbing the surge of evictions that have followed the end of pandemic eviction moratoriums.

“I lost everything I had because of issues with the rent relief program. Right before the pandemic, I put my life’s savings into opening a restaurant. I was then forced to close down, and as a result lost my income, my business, and my entire savings trying to hold on to what I had. I applied for rent relief and at first was denied without explanation. Then I appealed, got approved, but have now been waiting for nearly 2 years for the money to come through. I tried calling the program for help dozens of times but got no help. A year into waiting for the funding, my landlord pressured me to move out, and I became homeless. Thousands of lives have been destroyed because of the failure to get the money out to families that they are due. I am hopeful that this settlement will finally bring us closer to some relief,” said Blake Phillips, former resident of Los Angeles.

“In creating the Covid-19 rent relief program, the state promised to cover 100 percent of pandemic rent debt for tenants in California. We brought this case to ensure that the state lived up to that promise so hundreds of thousands of Californians could survive the pandemic,” said Jefferson McGee, State Board Chair of the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE). “Housing is health and housing is a human right and we will keep fighting to make that a reality for our members.” 

###

For media inquiries, email Alex Comisar here.

Back to Top

Are you interested in learning more about the ACCE v. HCD lawsuit?